|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
2/27 |
課程介紹 |
|
第2週 |
3/06 |
1. Judicial Review and the Role of the Supreme Court
*1) McCulloch v. Maryland [pp.55-65]
#Marbury v. Madison
#Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife [the law of standing to sue]
#Baker v. Carr [political question doctrine]
|
|
第3週 |
3/13 |
Federalism and the Powers of Federal Congress
2.1. Commerce Clause
*2) United States v. Lopez [pp.186-197]
*2) United States v. Morrison [pp.197-199]
|
|
第4週 |
3/20 |
Other Powers than Commerce Clause
*3) City of Boerne v. Flores [pp.226-229]
*3) New York v. United States [pp.237-248]
# Printz v. United States
#張文貞，〈邁向整合的崎嶇路—美國最高法院對聯邦權限的緊縮〉，《歐美研究》，34卷2期，頁1-41（2004）。
|
|
第5週 |
3/27 |
Separation of Powers and the Powers of President and Congress
3.1 The Emergency Powers
*4) Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (The Steel Seizure Case) [pp. 336-345]
*4) Dames & Moore v. Regan [pp.348-351]
3.2. Presidential Immunity and Privilege
*5) United States v. Nixon [pp.352-357]
|
|
第6週 |
4/03 |
Non-delegation Doctrine and Legislative Control over Executive Powers
*5) INS v. Chadha [pp. 370-377]
*6) Bowsher v. Synar [pp. 381-387]
*6) Morrison v. Olson [pp. 387-396]
|
|
第7週 |
4/10 |
授課教師赴美發表論文，停課乙次，如有需要，擇期補課。 |
|
第8週 |
4/17 |
Equality and the Constitution
4.1 Racial Equality
*7) Korematsu v. United States [pp.501-505]
*7) Washington v. Davis [pp.514-517]
*7) Loving v. Virginia [pp.533-535]
*8) City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co. [pp.557-574]
|
|
第9週 |
4/24 |
*9) Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena [pp.574-585]
4.2. Sexual Equality
*10) Craig v. Boren [pp.602-607]
*10) United States v. Virginia [pp.611-618]
|
|
第10週 |
5/01 |
*11) Romer v. Evans [pp.638-651]
4.3. Equality of Other Disadvantaged Groups
*12) Sugerman v. Dougall [pp.659-662]
*12) City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center [pp.679-681]
|
|
第11週 |
5/08 |
Implied Fundamental Rights
5.1. The Incorporation Controversy
*13) The Slaughter-House Cases [pp. 693-698]
**13) STONE ET AL., CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (4th 2001) [Reading p.702-709]
|
|
第12週 |
5/15 |
Fundamental Interests and the Equal Protection Clause
*14) Skinner v. Oklahoma [pp.736-739] (Right to have offspring)
#Lochner v. New York (Freedom of contract)
*14) Reynolds v. Sims [pp.748-752] (Right to vote)
*14) Davis v. Bandemer [pp. 764-768] (Right to vote)
|
|
第13週 |
5/22 |
*15) Shapiro v. Thompson [pp.781-785] (Right to travel)
*15) San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez [pp.795-802](Right to education)
*15) Plyler v. Doe [pp.804-809](Right to education)
|
|
第14週 |
5/29 |
5.3. Substantive Due Process
#Griswold v. Connecticut
#Roe v. Wade
*16) Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey [pp. 850-870] (Right to abortion)
*17) Stenberg v. Carhart [pp.871-883] (Right to abortion)
|
|
第15週 |
6/05 |
*18) Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health [pp.904-909] (Right to die)
*18) Washington v. Glucksberg [pp. 911-919] (Right to die)
5.3. Procedural Due Process
#Mathews v. Eldridge
|
|
第16週 |
6/12 |
修課同學撰寫期末報告 |
|
第17週 |
6/19 |
端午節放假 |
|
第18週 |
6/26 |
期末報告繳交截止日期 |